POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HRES1406FEDERALIN_COMMITTEE

Resolution Commemorating 175 Years of U.S.-Guatemala Relations

Original title: Commemorating 175 years of diplomatic relations between the United States and the Republic of Guatemala.

August 2, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Currently IN_COMMITTEE. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The resolution sets a formal congressional stance on U.S. foreign policy priorities regarding Guatemala, specifically calling for increased U.S. support to counter economic pressure from China and to address regional migration and corruption.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Guatemalan Americans

The resolution formally recognizes their contributions to the social, economic, and political development of the United States.

Guatemalan indigenous communities

The resolution urges the Guatemalan government to address their historical grievances and ensure their inclusion.

What changed

Current stage: IN_COMMITTEE.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This resolution formally recognizes the 175th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the United States and Guatemala. It highlights the history of bilateral cooperation on trade, migration, and anti-corruption efforts while urging continued collaboration on democratic reforms and human rights.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this resolution change U.S. law?
No, this is a non-binding resolution that expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding diplomatic relations and policy priorities.
What is the 'economic coercion' mentioned in the document?
The document refers to the People's Republic of China denying entry to Guatemalan goods, such as macadamia nuts and coffee, in response to Guatemala's diplomatic recognition of Taiwan.

Why It Matters

The resolution sets a formal congressional stance on U.S. foreign policy priorities regarding Guatemala, specifically calling for increased U.S. support to counter economic pressure from China and to address regional migration and corruption.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 5 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Economic Coercion

The resolution explicitly links U.S. foreign assistance to countering Chinese economic pressure on Guatemala, reflecting a shift toward using trade-related aid as a tool for diplomatic defense.

Connected Entities

personMr. CorreaCo-sponsor of the resolutionMap →
personVirginia LaparraFormer prosecutor who advocated against corruptionMap →
personMs. VelazquezCo-sponsor of the resolutionMap →
personMr. Castro of TexasCo-sponsor of the resolutionMap →
personMs. TitusCo-sponsor of the resolutionMap →
personMs. Wasserman SchultzCo-sponsor of the resolutionMap →
personMs. SchakowskyCo-sponsor of the resolutionMap →
personMrs. RamirezLead sponsor of the resolutionMap →
personFrancisco Villagran de LeonFormer diplomat who dedicated his career to strengthening Guatemalan democracyMap →
organizationPeople's Republic of ChinaCountry attempting to intimidate Guatemala through trade restrictionsMap →
personMr. McGovernCo-sponsor of the resolutionMap →
personSofia Tot AcIndigenous activist who advocated for indigenous rightsMap →
personJose Ramon ZamoraJournalist who advocated against corruptionMap →
personBernardo ArevaloCurrent President of GuatemalaMap →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record