The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act
Last action · September 19, 2025: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.Sponsors: Julie Fedorchak and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
This bill creates a new, standardized federal process for approving energy infrastructure projects that cross U.S. international borders, such as oil pipelines, natural gas lines, and electric transmission lines. It removes the requirement for s for these projects and sets specific deadlines for federal agencies to review and approve applications.
The bill shifts authority for cross-border energy projects from the President to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy, potentially accelerating the approval timeline for energy companies seeking to import or export resources with Canada and Mexico.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Energy infrastructure developers
These entities must obtain a certificate of crossing under the new process for future projects.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
The agency is tasked with new rulemaking and approval responsibilities for oil and gas border-crossing facilities.
Department of Energy
The agency is tasked with new rulemaking and approval responsibilities for electric transmission border-crossing facilities.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill change environmental review requirements?
What happens to projects that are already operating or have pending applications?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
24 actions- Sep 19, 2025SenateCommitteeReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- Sep 18, 2025HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Sep 18, 2025HouseFloorOn passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 203 (Roll no. 277). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4423)
- Sep 18, 2025HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 203 (Roll no. 277). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4424: 7)
- Sep 18, 2025HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4442)
- Sep 18, 2025HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3062, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill, and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Show 18 earlier actions
- Sep 18, 2025HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- Sep 18, 2025HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3062.
- Sep 18, 2025HouseRule provides for consideration of H.R. 4922, H.R. 5143, H.R. 5140, H.R. 5125, H.R. 1047, H.R. 3015 and H.R. 3062. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4922, H.R. 5143, H.R. 5140, H.R. 5125, H.R. 1047, H.R. 3015, and H.R. 3062 under a closed rule, and provides for a motion to recommit on each measure.
- Sep 18, 2025HouseConsidered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 707. (consideration: CR H4423)
- Sep 16, 2025HouseRule H. Res. 707 passed House.
- Sep 15, 2025HouseRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 707 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4922, H.R. 5143, H.R. 5140, H.R. 5125, H.R. 1047, H.R. 3015 and H.R. 3062. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4922, H.R. 5143, H.R. 5140, H.R. 5125, H.R. 1047, H.R. 3015, and H.R. 3062 under a closed rule, and provides for a motion to recommit on each measure.
- Jul 2, 2025HousePlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 151.
- Jul 2, 2025HouseCommittee on Natural Resources discharged.
- Jul 2, 2025HouseCommittee on Transportation discharged.
- Jul 2, 2025HouseReported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-186, Part I.
- Jun 25, 2025HouseCommitteeOrdered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 28 - 23.
- Jun 25, 2025HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Jun 5, 2025HouseForwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 13.
- Jun 5, 2025HouseSubcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Jun 3, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
- Apr 29, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.
- Apr 29, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Apr 29, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
426
- Yes
- 224
- No
- 202
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (426)
402 more members
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Executive to Agency Power Transfer
The bill systematically removes the President's role in permitting cross-border energy projects, centralizing that authority within the FERC and the Department of Energy.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
