Proposed Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Act
March 13, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
If enacted, this legislation would have significantly restricted the ability of local cities and counties to set their own zoning rules, potentially allowing for taller, denser residential and commercial buildings near transit hubs regardless of local opposition.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Local governments
Required to adopt ordinances and resolutions to establish TOD zones and amend their comprehensive plans.
Public transit providers
Encouraged to develop land within TOD zones and receive net proceeds from such developments for operations and capital improvements.
Property owners in TOD zones
Gained the ability to develop land for mixed-use purposes by right, subject to the new state-mandated zoning standards.
Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a 'TOD zone'?
Could local governments still hold public hearings for these developments?
Does this bill apply to historic homes?
Why It Matters
If enacted, this legislation would have significantly restricted the ability of local cities and counties to set their own zoning rules, potentially allowing for taller, denser residential and commercial buildings near transit hubs regardless of local opposition.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable with Committee Substitute
Total
14
Yes
14
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (14)
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Favorable with Committee Substitute
Total
8
Yes
8
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
State Preemption of Local Zoning
The bill represents a significant attempt to standardize high-density zoning at the state level, effectively removing local discretionary power over transit-adjacent development.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools