The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Georgia House Bill 211 Grants PFAS Liability Shield to Manufacturers, Farmers, and Waste Facilities
Last action · February 11, 2026: House Withdrawn, RecommittedSponsors: Kasey Carpenter and 3 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Georgia House Bill 211 shields businesses, manufacturers, farmers, wastewater facilities, and landfills from lawsuits related to chemicals, provided they are not grossly negligent and comply with environmental regulations. The legislation establishes clear statutory definitions for PFAS substances, manufacturers, and receivers, while preserving personal injury liability and state enforcement powers.
The measure alters legal accountability by protecting industrial users, waste handlers, and agricultural operators from civil damage claims tied to forever chemicals, shifting the legal burden onto plaintiffs to plead and prove before a court.
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large group of synthetic chemicals used in consumer products and industrial applications that do not easily degrade in the environment. context
- State tort laws govern civil wrongs and damages outside of contractual agreements, establishing when injured parties may seek compensation through the courts. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
PFAS receivers
Receive legal immunity from civil damages related to PFAS use, receipt, or disposal, provided they comply with environmental limits and avoid gross negligence.
PFAS manufacturers
Explicitly excluded from the definition of PFAS receivers and therefore do not qualify for the liability protections granted by the act.
Environmental engineers and consultants
Extend eligibility for the same liability protections when providing professional services to PFAS receivers.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division
Retains full authority to bring enforcement actions against entities violating regulations, regardless of the liability shield.
Key Facts
- HB 211 creates Chapter 17 of Title 51 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, titled the 'PFAS Receiver Shield Act.'
- The bill defines a 'PFAS receiver' as any person or entity—excluding manufacturers—that uses PFAS in manufacturing or agriculture, receives or owns goods containing PFAS, or is regulated by the EPD and handles industrial/household solid waste or wastewater containing PFAS.
- Absence of gross negligence protects PFAS receivers from liability for damages involving the intended or incidental use, receipt, or disposal of PFAS.
- Plaintiffs must plead facts with particularity to demonstrate gross negligence, and the determination of gross negligence is decided by the court as a question of law.
Show all 10 facts
- PFAS receivers handling industrial effluent or solid waste are exempt from liability if they comply with all testing and limits set by the EPA and the Georgia EPD.
- The immunity provisions do not apply to enforcement claims brought by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
- Immunity protections extend to environmental engineers and consultants providing professional services related to a PFAS receiver's use or disposal of PFAS.
- The act does not limit the right of a defendant to seek and recover damages for tortious injury or death of a person, nor does it waive the duty to warn the public of safety threats under existing law.
- The chapter explicitly does not modify or supersede titles relating to crimes, health, workers' compensation, or emergency management.
- The act becomes effective immediately upon approval by the Governor or upon becoming law without approval.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who qualifies as a 'PFAS receiver' under this bill?
Can a PFAS receiver still be sued if they are granted immunity?
Does this bill protect environmental consultants working with companies that handle PFAS?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
5 actions- Feb 11, 2026HouseHouse Withdrawn, Recommitted
- Feb 10, 2026HouseCommitteeHouse Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute
- Feb 4, 2025HouseHouse Second Readers
- Feb 3, 2025HouseIntroducedHouse First Readers
- Jan 30, 2025HouseIntroducedHouse Hopper
Version history & redline
2 versions on fileLobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Creation of Specific Tort Immunity for Chemical Handlers
The bill carves out a specialized legal shield within Title 51 that shifts the burden of proof onto plaintiffs to establish gross negligence in chemical-related civil suits.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.legis.ga.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 80)
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz45Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
