The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.House Resolution Declaring Iran a State Sponsor of Terrorism
Last action · March 5, 2026: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Sponsors: Brian Mast and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This resolution formally states the position of the U.S. House of Representatives that Iran remains the world's largest . It cites various historical and recent actions, including support for proxy groups and attacks on U.S. personnel, to support this declaration.
This resolution establishes the official policy stance of the House of Representatives regarding Iran, which serves as a formal basis for future legislative actions, sanctions, or diplomatic strategies concerning the Iranian government.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Iranian Government
The resolution formally labels the state as the world's largest sponsor of terrorism.
U.S. Military Personnel
The resolution references past and ongoing threats to U.S. servicemembers from Iranian-backed proxy groups.
Key Facts
- The House of Representatives declares it is U.S. policy that Iran is the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism.
- The resolution cites that Iranian-backed proxy militias are responsible for the deaths of at least 603 U.S. servicemembers in Iraq between 2003 and 2011.
- The resolution references the January 2024 deaths of three U.S. servicemembers (Rivers, Sanders, and Moffett) in a proxy attack in Jordan.
- The document notes the reimposition of six United Nations Security Council Resolutions against Iran in September 2025 due to nuclear and weapons activities.
Show all 7 facts
- The resolution claims Iran provides financial and military support to Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis.
- The resolution alleges Iran harbors senior al-Qaeda leaders.
- The resolution references reports from the IAEA regarding Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium and restricted access to undeclared nuclear sites.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this resolution change current laws or sanctions?
What is the purpose of this document?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: signed.
Procedural history
10 actions- Mar 5, 2026HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Mar 5, 2026HouseFloorOn motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 372 - 53, 2 Present (Roll no. 84).
- Mar 5, 2026HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 372 - 53, 2 Present (Roll no. 84).
- Mar 5, 2026HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2448-2449)
- Mar 4, 2026HouseAt the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- Mar 4, 2026HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 1099.
Show 4 earlier actions
- Mar 4, 2026HouseConsidered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2392-2395; text: CR H2392)
- Mar 4, 2026HouseMr. Mast moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
- Mar 4, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Mar 4, 2026HouseSubmitted in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
421
- Yes
- 370
- No
- 51
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (421)
397 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree
Total
432
- Yes
- 372
- No
- 53
- Present
- 2
- Not voting
- 5
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (1)
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Formalization of Iran Policy
The resolution serves to codify the House's stance on Iran's role in global terrorism, likely as a precursor to future legislative debates on sanctions or military funding.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
