The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Minnesota House Bill 135 Requires Consecutive Sentencing for Local Inmate Assaults on Sheriffs
Last action · April 10, 2025: Author added ZeleznikarSponsors: Andrew Myers and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Minnesota House Bill 135 requires inmates in local correctional facilities who assault a county sheriff or deputy to serve their assault sentences consecutively to any existing or prior sentences, starting August 1, 2025. Such inmates also forfeit time-served credit toward the new assault sentence.
Extends mandatory consecutive sentencing and eliminates time-served credit specifically for local facility inmates convicted of assaulting sheriffs or deputy sheriffs, aligning local jail rules closer to existing state prison inmate provisions.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Local correctional facility inmates
Inmates who assault a county sheriff or deputy must serve assault sentences consecutively and cannot receive time-served credit toward that new sentence.
County sheriffs and deputy sheriffs
Victims of assaults covered under the expanded consecutive sentencing requirement.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is affected by this bill?
Do inmates receive credit for time served toward the new assault sentence?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
2 actions- Apr 10, 2025HouseAuthor added Zeleznikar
- Feb 10, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduction and first reading, referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.revisor.mn.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
