POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Minnesota House Bill 135 Requires Consecutive Sentencing for Local Inmate Assaults on Sheriffs

Original title: Consecutive sentences required for assaults committed by certain inmates of local facilities.

Last action · April 10, 2025: Author added ZeleznikarSponsors: Andrew Myers and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Minnesota House Bill 135 requires inmates in local correctional facilities who assault a county sheriff or deputy to serve their assault sentences consecutively to any existing or prior sentences, starting August 1, 2025. Such inmates also forfeit time-served credit toward the new assault sentence.

Why it matters

Extends mandatory consecutive sentencing and eliminates time-served credit specifically for local facility inmates convicted of assaulting sheriffs or deputy sheriffs, aligning local jail rules closer to existing state prison inmate provisions.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Local correctional facility inmates

Inmates who assault a county sheriff or deputy must serve assault sentences consecutively and cannot receive time-served credit toward that new sentence.

Directly affected

County sheriffs and deputy sheriffs

Victims of assaults covered under the expanded consecutive sentencing requirement.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is affected by this bill?
Inmates housed in local correctional facilities such as county jails, work farms, or workhouses who are convicted of assaulting a county sheriff or sheriff's deputy.
Do inmates receive credit for time served toward the new assault sentence?
No, the inmate is not entitled to credit against the sentence imposed for the assault for time served in confinement for the earlier sentence.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2025House
    Author added Zeleznikar
  2. Feb 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduction and first reading, referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Centennial Office Building, Office of the Revisor of Statutes, Minnesota Legislature and 2 more
locationCentennial Office Building“Location of the Office of the Revisor of Statutes”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Revisor of Statutes“Publishing agency for Minnesota statutes”Map →
OrganizationMinnesota Legislature“Legislative body passing the act”Map →
locationSt. Paul“City where the Centennial Office Building is located”Map →
OrganizationMinnesota House of Representatives“Originating legislative body”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.revisor.mn.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record