POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part oftaxes
HR6440FEDERALin_committee

Proposed Tax Rule Change for Private Foundations and Employee Stock Ownership

Original title: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for purposes of the tax on private foundation excess business holdings to treat as outstanding any employee-owned stock purchased by a business enterprise pursuant to certain employee stock ownership retirement plans.

December 4, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.Nov 15, 2023
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

This bill changes the tax calculation for private foundations that own businesses, potentially affecting their tax liability if they purchase stock back from employee retirement plans.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Private foundations

Foundations that hold business interests may see changes in how their ownership percentages are calculated for tax purposes.

Business enterprises with ESOPs

Businesses that buy back stock from their employee retirement plans may be affected by how that stock is classified for foundation tax compliance.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes a change to the tax code regarding how private foundations calculate their '.' It would allow certain stock purchased by a business from an employee stock ownership plan to be treated as 'outstanding' stock for tax purposes, provided specific conditions are met.

Key Facts

  • The bill amends Section 4943(c)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code regarding taxes on private foundation excess business holdings.
  • It allows non-tradable voting stock purchased by a business from an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) to be treated as 'outstanding' stock.
  • The stock must have been purchased on or after January 1, 2005, in connection with a plan distribution.
  • The stock must be held as treasury stock, cancelled, or retired by the business enterprise.
  • The treatment of this stock as 'outstanding' is capped at a maximum of 49 percent of total holdings.
  • The rule does not apply to stock purchased from a plan within the first 10 years of the plan's establishment.
  • The amendments apply to taxable years ending after the date of the bill's enactment.
  • The bill includes a special rule for 'grandfathered' foundations regarding decreases in ownership percentages resulting from these specific stock purchases.

Why It Matters

This bill changes the tax calculation for private foundations that own businesses, potentially affecting their tax liability if they purchase stock back from employee retirement plans.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an 'excess business holding' for a private foundation?
Under current tax law, private foundations are generally limited in the percentage of a business they can own; if they exceed these limits, they may be subject to excise taxes.
Does this bill apply to all stock purchases?
No, it only applies to voting stock that is not readily tradable on a securities market and was purchased from an under specific conditions.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Retroactive Application

The bill allows for the treatment of stock purchased as far back as January 1, 2005, to be considered under these new rules.

Connected Entities

otherInternal Revenue Code of 1986The federal tax law being amended.Map →
organizationCommittee on Ways and MeansThe committee to which the bill was referred.Map →
personGreg SteubeMember of the House of Representatives who introduced the bill.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record