POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofGaming →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

New Jersey bill expands self-exclusion options for in-person gambling to website and mail

Original title: Allows problem gamblers to request placement on Division of Gaming Enforcement's list for self-excluded persons through division's website, by mail, or in-person.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Tourism, Gaming and the Arts CommitteeSponsors: Auth, Robert and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

New Jersey allows individuals seeking self-exclusion from in-person gambling to submit required documentation through the Division of Gaming Enforcement's website, by mail, or in person, supplementing existing in-person requirements.

Why it matters

Changes accessibility for individuals seeking gambling restrictions by removing the mandate to travel to specific physical offices for in-person self-exclusion requests.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Problem gamblers

Individuals can submit self-exclusion requests via website, mail, or in person instead of being limited to physical offices.

Directly affected

Licensed casinos and simulcasting facilities

Facilities receive statutory liability protections regarding self-excluded persons engaging in gaming or inadvertent disclosures of identities.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can someone request placement on the self-exclusion list under this bill?
A person can request placement by submitting the required documentation through the Division of Gaming Enforcement's website, by mail, or in person.
Are casinos liable if a self-excluded person manages to gamble?
No. Licensed casinos and or their employees are not liable in any judicial proceeding for failing to withhold gaming privileges or allowing a self-excluded person to engage in gaming.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Tourism, Gaming and the Arts Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Auth, RobertPrimary sponsorNo profile match
Flynn, Victoria A.Primary sponsorNo profile match

Connected Entities

New Jersey Racing Commission, Division of Gaming Enforcement
OrganizationNew Jersey Racing Commission“Previously hosted offices where in-person self-exclusion requests could be made.”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Gaming Enforcement“Maintains the list of self-excluded persons and establishes regulations.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record