POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah exempts subcontractors and suppliers list providers from contractor licensing requirements

Original title: Construction Consultant Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Tracy Miller

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

This bill modifies the Utah Construction Trades Licensing Act.

Why it matters

Changes licensing obligations for construction consultants and referral services, determining whether specific businesses must obtain state contractor credentials to operate legally.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Construction consultants

Individuals or entities providing only subcontractor or supplier lists are exempted from contractor licensing requirements.

Directly affected

Construction Trades Licensing Commission

The commission operates under modified statutory definitions regarding contractor classifications.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is exempted from contractor licensing under HB 344?
Persons who exclusively provide or offer to provide a list of subcontractors or suppliers are removed from contractor licensing requirements.
Does this bill appropriate any state funds?
No money is appropriated in this bill.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

19 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
  4. Mar 4, 2026House
    House Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
  5. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  6. Feb 26, 2026House Rules Committee
    Bill Substituted by Sponsor in House Rules Comm
Show 13 earlier actions
  1. Feb 25, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0344S01
  2. Feb 24, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0344S01
  3. Feb 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0344S01
  4. Feb 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0344S01
  5. Jan 28, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  6. Jan 27, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0344
  7. Jan 27, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0344
  8. Jan 23, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  9. Jan 23, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  10. Jan 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0344
  11. Jan 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0344
  12. Jan 23, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  13. Jan 23, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference95% confidence

Coordination with HB 40

The bill includes explicit coordination language with H.B. 40 to adjust Subsection 58-55-101(7)(b) on January 1, 2027, ensuring legal consistency between concurrent licensing measures.

Connected Entities

Salt Lake County, Associated General Contractors of Utah, Division of Corporations and Commercial Code and 9 more
locationSalt Lake County“County restriction for prelicensure course providers”Map →
OrganizationAssociated General Contractors of Utah“Approved prelicensure course provider”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Corporations and Commercial Code“Registry for sole proprietorship alarm companies”Map →
locationWeber County“County restriction for prelicensure course providers”Map →
OrganizationUtah Home Builders Association“Approved prelicensure course provider”Map →
PersonLONG“Senate Sponsor”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Workforce Services“Reference for employee definition”Map →
OrganizationUtah Chapter of the Associated Builders and Contractors“Approved prelicensure course provider”Map →
PersonTracy J. Miller“Chief Sponsor in the House”Map →
locationDavis County“County restriction for prelicensure course providers”Map →
OrganizationInternal Revenue Service“Reference for employee definition”Map →
locationUtah County“County restriction for prelicensure course providers”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record