POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Ohio enacts the Innocence Act, requiring online age verification and geofencing for obscene or harmful materials

Original title: Enact the Innocence Act

Last action · March 25, 2026: Referred to JudiciarySponsors: Steve Demetriou and 53 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Commercial websites and online services offering material harmful to juveniles or obscene content must implement commercial age verification, dynamic geolocation geofencing, and strict data-deletion policies under a measure passed by the House. The bill establishes the Innocence Act Enforcement Fund and grants the attorney general exclusive enforcement authority, including civil penalties of up to $100,000 per day for noncompliance.

Why it matters

Online platforms distributing restricted content face daily civil penalties up to $100,000 for failing to verify user ages or block underage access, while the state creates a dedicated enforcement fund receiving 25% of collected penalties to cover attorney general expenses.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Organizations

Commercial establishments dealing in material harmful to juveniles must implement age verification, geofencing, and data-deletion policies, and face civil penalties for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Attorney General

The attorney general receives exclusive authority to investigate, subpoena, and bring civil enforcement actions, along with funding allocated to a new enforcement fund.

Directly affected

Minors

Minors are restricted from accessing online material that is obscene or harmful to juveniles through mandatory age verification and geofencing blocks.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What organizations are required to perform age verification under the Innocence Act?
Commercial establishments that derive a significant or substantial portion of their revenues from, or devote a significant portion of their content or advertising to, materials that are obscene or harmful to juveniles on the internet.
Can private citizens sue websites that fail to comply with these age verification requirements?
No, the bill explicitly prohibits any private right of action and gives the attorney general exclusive authority to enforce the provisions.
What happens if an organization violates the age verification or geofencing requirements?
The attorney general may bring a civil action in a court of common pleas seeking injunctive relief and civil penalties of up to one hundred thousand dollars for each day of violation.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Mar 25, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Judiciary
  2. Mar 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Passed
  4. Mar 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported - Substitute (Technology and Innovation)
  5. Feb 12, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Technology and Innovation
  6. Feb 11, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 49 more sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection100% confidence

Creation of Dedicated Enforcement Fund

Civil penalties collected from violations are split between the consumer protection enforcement fund (75%) and the newly created innocence act enforcement fund (25%) to cover attorney general expenses.

Connected Entities

Federal Communications Commission, Gary Click, Rodney Creech and 10 more
OrganizationFederal Communications Commission“Defines broadband service”Map →
PersonGary Click“Representative, District 88”Map →
PersonRodney Creech“Representative, District 40”Map →
PersonThaddeus J. Claggett“Representative, District 68”Map →
PersonMichael D. Dovilla“Representative, District 17”Map →
PersonJosh Williams“Representative, District 44, Republican”Map →
PersonLevi Dean“Representative, District 71”Map →
PersonKellie Deeter“Representative, District 54”Map →
PersonJack Daniels“Representative, District 32”Map →
PersonSean Brennan“Representative, District 14”Map →
PersonSteve Demetriou“Representative, District 35, Republican”Map →
PersonTim Barhorst“Representative, District 85”Map →
PersonAdam Bird“Representative, District 63”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record