POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HJRES122FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

Proposed Constitutional Amendment on Campaign Finance Regulation

Original title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections and to enact public financing systems for political campaigns.

September 17, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Sep 17, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If ratified, this amendment would fundamentally change the legal framework for campaign finance by allowing federal and state governments to restrict political spending and corporate influence in elections, overriding previous Supreme Court precedents.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Political Candidates

Candidates would be subject to new, potentially stricter limits on the amount of money they can raise and spend.

Corporations and Artificial Entities

These entities could be legally prohibited from spending money to influence elections under the proposed authority.

State Legislatures

State legislatures are required to vote on the ratification of this amendment.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

H.J. Res. 122 is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would grant Congress and individual states the authority to set limits on political campaign contributions and spending. It would also allow for the creation of public campaign financing systems and permit laws that distinguish between individual donors and corporate entities.

Key Facts

  • The resolution proposes a new article to the U.S. Constitution.
  • Congress and states would be granted authority to impose viewpoint-neutral limits on raising and spending money to influence elections.
  • Congress and states would be authorized to create public campaign financing systems.
  • Public financing systems could be designed to offset private wealth influence.
  • Congress and states would have the power to distinguish between natural persons and corporations or other artificial entities.
  • Congress and states could prohibit corporations or artificial entities from spending money to influence elections.
  • The amendment explicitly states it does not grant power to abridge the freedom of the press.
  • Ratification requires approval by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states.
  • The amendment must be ratified within seven years of its submission to the states.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this amendment automatically change campaign finance laws?
No. It is a proposed constitutional amendment. It must first pass both houses of Congress with a two-thirds vote and then be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures.
Would this allow the government to limit what newspapers or media outlets say about elections?
No. Section 4 of the proposed amendment explicitly states that nothing in the article shall be construed to grant the power to abridge the freedom of the press.
Could this lead to a ban on corporate political spending?
Yes. Section 3 grants Congress and the states the power to distinguish between natural persons and corporations, including the power to prohibit corporations from spending money to influence elections.

Why It Matters

If ratified, this amendment would fundamentally change the legal framework for campaign finance by allowing federal and state governments to restrict political spending and corporate influence in elections, overriding previous Supreme Court precedents.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Constitutional Override of Judicial Precedent

The resolution is designed to provide a constitutional basis for campaign finance regulations that have previously been struck down by the Supreme Court as violations of the First Amendment.

Connected Entities

organizationU.S. CongressThe body proposing the amendment.Map →
personJoe NegusePrimary sponsor of the resolution.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance95
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record