POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofEnergy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah prohibits private energy users from using eminent domain for certain single-customer pipelines

Original title: Energy User Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: Senate/ filedSponsors: Scott Sandall and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

This bill modifies the right to exercise eminent domain for energy users.

Why it matters

Private property owners facing potential condemnation face new legal protections against land acquisition for single-source energy pipelines, altering how independent power generators secure infrastructure routes.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Private energy generators

Private entities producing electricity are barred from utilizing eminent domain to acquire land rights for single-user or self-use energy generation pipelines.

Directly affected

Property owners

Landowners gain protection from having their property condemned through eminent domain for private, single-beneficiary energy pipelines.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill ban all pipeline construction by private energy companies?
No. It only restricts the use of (forced property acquisition) for pipelines that serve a single energy generator's own property or designated beneficiary, and includes exceptions for multi-customer lines and existing utility corridors.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · on the House floor.

Procedural history

39 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  3. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  4. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  5. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules
  6. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ circled
Show 33 earlier actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  2. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  3. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
  4. Mar 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  5. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  6. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  7. Mar 3, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
  8. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ substituted
  9. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  10. Mar 3, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0231S02
  11. Mar 3, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0231S02
  12. Mar 3, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0231S02
  13. Mar 3, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0231S02
  14. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  15. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
  16. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  17. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ substituted
  18. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  19. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  20. Feb 26, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0231S01
  21. Feb 26, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0231S01
  22. Feb 25, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0231S01
  23. Feb 25, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0231S01
  24. Feb 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  25. Feb 5, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0231
  26. Feb 4, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0231
  27. Feb 3, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  28. Feb 2, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  29. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  30. Jan 30, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0231
  31. Jan 30, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0231
  32. Jan 30, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  33. Jan 30, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Calvin Roberts, Water Quality Board, Federal Communications Commission and 5 more
PersonCalvin Roberts“House Sponsor, Representative in the Utah Legislature”Map →
OrganizationWater Quality Board“Board making rules for the underground injection control program”Map →
OrganizationFederal Communications Commission“Federal agency licensing broadcast stations”Map →
PersonScott D. Sandall“Chief Sponsor, Senator in the Utah Legislature”Map →
locationUtah“State jurisdiction enacting the legislation”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Transportation“State agency authorized to exercise eminent domain for the West Davis Highway”Map →
locationGreat Salt Lake“Geographic location subject to sovereign land provisions”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Water Quality“Division issuing permits for underground injection control”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record