POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Minnesota House Bill 595 makes election judge party affiliations public data

Original title: Election judge party affiliation classified as public data on individuals.

Last action · February 13, 2025: Introduction and first reading, referred to Judiciary Finance and Civil LawSponsor: Duane Quam

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Minnesota House Bill 595 requires appointing authorities to maintain public lists of election judges showing their major political party affiliation or non-affiliation. The measure classifies these specific lists as and repeals previous restrictions on sharing this party affiliation data.

Why it matters

Makes personal political party affiliations of local poll workers accessible to the general public, altering how election administration data privacy is handled under state law.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Election judges

Their major political party affiliation or non-affiliation status on appointing authority lists becomes public data.

Directly affected

Appointing authorities

They are required to maintain lists of election judges that indicate major political party affiliations as public data.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can anyone view an election judge's party affiliation under this bill?
Yes, lists created by appointing authorities that indicate the major political party affiliation or non-affiliation of each election judge are classified as .
Does this bill change all election judge lists to public data?
No, the general lists described in subdivisions 1 and 2 remain classified as not .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduction and first reading, referred to Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Minnesota
locationMinnesota“State where the bill is introduced.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.revisor.mn.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record