POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofUap →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Disclosure Act of 2026

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6344

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This proposed amendment creates a formal, independent process for the federal government to collect, review, and publicly disclose records related to , non-human intelligence, and recovered technologies of unknown origin. It establishes a nine-member Review Board to oversee the declassification of these records and mandates the creation of a centralized collection at the National Archives.

Why it matters

This amendment establishes a legal framework to force the disclosure of government records regarding UAPs and non-human intelligence, potentially impacting national security protocols and public access to classified information, with $20 million authorized for implementation in 2025.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Federal Government Agencies

Agencies must identify, organize, and transmit UAP-related records to the National Archives and comply with Review Board directives.

Directly affected

Private entities holding UAP-related technology

The federal government is authorized to exercise eminent domain over recovered technologies of unknown origin or biological evidence of non-human intelligence held by these entities.

Directly affected

Whistleblowers and witnesses

Individuals providing information to the Review Board are granted specific legal protections.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What records are covered by this act?
The act covers any record related to UAPs, technologies of unknown origin, or non-human intelligence held by federal, state, or local government agencies, or private entities under contract with the government.
Can the government still keep some records secret?
Yes, disclosure can be postponed if there is clear and convincing evidence that release would harm national security, intelligence operations, foreign relations, or personal privacy.
Who will be on the Review Board?
The board will consist of 9 citizens appointed by the President, including a national security official, a foreign service official, a scientist or engineer, an economist, a historian, and a sociologist.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Mandatory Eminent Domain

The inclusion of eminent domain authority over private entities holding non-human intelligence evidence represents a significant expansion of federal power in the context of UAP disclosure.

Connected Entities

All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, Mr. Schumer, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Review Board and 2 more
OrganizationAll-domain Anomaly Resolution Office“Office responsible for developing declassification guidance after the Review Boa”Map →
PersonMr. Schumer“Senate Majority Leader who submitted the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Review Board“Independent board created to review and manage UAP record disclosure.”Map →
PersonMr. Rounds“Senator who co-submitted the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationNational Archives and Records Administration“Repository for the UAP Records Collection.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance95
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment90
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz80
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record