POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Resolution to End Unauthorized Military Involvement in Venezuela

Original title: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.

Last action · November 6, 2025: Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 51. Record Vote Number: 608. (consideration: CR S7958)Sponsors: Timothy Kaine and 18 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This resolution directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from in or against Venezuela unless Congress explicitly authorizes the military action. It asserts that current military activities and planning regarding Venezuela have not received the required congressional approval.

Why it matters

This resolution seeks to limit the President's ability to engage in military conflict in Venezuela without a formal declaration of war or specific statutory authorization from Congress.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

President of the United States

The President is directed to terminate military hostilities in Venezuela unless specific congressional authorization is granted.

Directly affected

United States Armed Forces

The deployment and operational status of military personnel in or near Venezuela are subject to the termination directive.

Key Facts

  • The resolution directs the President to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces for hostilities in or against Venezuela.
  • The mandate applies unless Congress passes a declaration of war or a specific authorization for the use of military force.
  • The resolution includes a 'rule of construction' allowing the U.S. to defend itself from an armed attack or imminent threat.
  • Congress asserts it has not declared war on Venezuela or authorized military force there.
Show all 8 facts
  • The resolution cites reports of CIA authorization for covert lethal operations in Venezuela as evidence of imminent hostilities.
  • The resolution cites the buildup of U.S. military assets and personnel near Venezuela as evidence of imminent hostilities.
  • The resolution cites official government statements regarding planning for ground strikes as evidence of imminent hostilities.
  • The resolution invokes expedited procedures under the International Security and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 for consideration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill prevent the U.S. from defending itself?
No. The resolution explicitly states that it does not prevent the United States from defending itself against an armed attack or an imminent threat of one.
What happens if this resolution passes?
The President would be legally directed to end military in or against Venezuela unless Congress provides specific authorization.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Nov 6, 2025Senate
    Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 51. Record Vote Number: 608. (consideration: CR S7958)
  2. Nov 6, 2025Senate
    Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations made. (Pursuant to the Arms Export Control Act of 1976). (consideration: CR S7945-7958)
  3. Oct 16, 2025SenateCommittee
    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
  4. Oct 16, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in Senate

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Outcome not reportedSenate11/6/2025Voteview

Total

100

Yes
49
No
51
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

How they voted (100)

76 more members
Brian SchatzDyes
Tammy BaldwinDyes
Christopher MurphyDyes
Tom CottonRno
Lisa Blunt RochesterDyes
John BarrassoRno
Pete RickettsRno
Bernie MorenoRno
Chuck GrassleyRno
Tim ScottRno
John BoozmanRno
Christopher CoonsDyes
Elissa SlotkinDyes
Peter WelchDyes
Tammy DuckworthDyes
Mark WarnerDyes
Ruben GallegoDyes
Mike LeeRno
Ted BuddRno
Jeanne ShaheenDyes
Timothy KaineDyes
Jon OssoffDyes
Thomas TillisRno
David McCormickRno
John CurtisRno
Roger MarshallRno
Adam SchiffDyes
Catherine Cortez MastoDyes
Deb FischerRno
Elizabeth WarrenDyes
Tommy TubervilleRno
Tina SmithDyes
Joni ErnstRno
Raphael WarnockDyes
James RischRno
Chris Van HollenDyes
Ted CruzRno
John CornynRno
Kirsten GillibrandDyes
James LankfordRno
Bill HagertyRno
Charles SchumerDyes
Cory BookerDyes
Cynthia LummisRno
Maria CantwellDyes
Richard DurbinDyes
John HoevenRno
Josh HawleyRno
Dan SullivanRno
Markwayne MullinRno
Gary PetersDyes
Sheldon WhitehouseDyes
Jerry MoranRno
Angela AlsobrooksDyes
Angus KingIyes
Kevin CramerRno
Roger WickerRno
Jon HustedRno
Jim BanksRno
James JusticeRno
Lisa MurkowskiRyes
Ron JohnsonRno
Richard BlumenthalDyes
John ThuneRno
Ben LujanDyes
Michael BennetDyes
Mike CrapoRno
Lindsey GrahamRno
Alex PadillaDyes
Ron WydenDyes
Ashley MoodyRno
Patty MurrayDyes
Edward MarkeyDyes
Amy KlobucharDyes
Katie BrittRno
Tim SheehyRno

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Invocation of War Powers Resolution

The resolution explicitly uses the War Powers Resolution framework to force a congressional vote on military engagement, a rare and significant procedural move.

Connected Entities

Adam Schiff, Timothy Kaine, Central Intelligence Agency and 2 more
PersonAdam Schiff“Senator who co-sponsored the resolution.”Map →
PersonTimothy Kaine“Senator who introduced the resolution.”Map →
OrganizationCentral Intelligence Agency“Cited in findings regarding authorization for covert lethal operations.”Map →
PersonRand Paul“Senator who co-sponsored the resolution.”Map →
locationVenezuela“The country where military hostilities are alleged to be occurring or imminent.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 90)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record