POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofEnergy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Indiana Senate Bill 260 Establishes New Permitting, Fee, and Liability Rules for Carbon Dioxide Pipelines and Sequestration Projects

Original title: Carbon dioxide.

Last action · January 8, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on UtilitiesSponsors: Spencer Deery and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Indiana Senate Bill 260 requires carbon dioxide transmission pipeline applicants to submit risk assessments and injection estimates, establishes an annual fee of eight cents per ton for carbon sequestration pilot projects, and mandates that prior operators remain liable for past negligence or willful misconduct despite ownership transfers.

Background
  • The Indiana General Assembly is the state legislature responsible for enacting statutes regarding natural resources and eminent domain. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Carbon dioxide transmission pipeline companies

Must submit expanded application materials including risk assessments, scenario modeling, and injection estimates.

Directly affected

Property owners

Eligible to have perceived risks of hazardous conditions considered when determining eminent domain compensation.

Directly affected

Operators of carbon sequestration pilot projects

Required to pay an annual fee per ton of injected carbon dioxide and remain liable for past negligence after ownership transfers.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What information must a carbon dioxide pipeline applicant provide to the state?
Applicants must provide a $1,000 filing fee, a signed verification statement, a risk assessment with scenario modeling, an estimate of carbon dioxide to be injected, and proof of technical and financial ability.
How are property owners compensated if their land is subjected to eminent domain for a carbon project?
Compensation must account for the present day diminution in value of the residue of the property caused by the perceived risk of a hazardous condition.
Does selling a carbon sequestration pilot project clear the previous owner of liability?
No, a transfer of ownership does not relieve a prior operator from liability for any negligence or willful misconduct that occurred before the transfer.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 8, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First reading: referred to Committee on Utilities
  2. Jan 8, 2026Senate
    Authored by Senators Deery, Niemeyer

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expanded Liability Retention

The bill explicitly prevents previous operators of carbon sequestration projects from escaping historical liability for negligence through ownership transfers.

Connected Entities

Rick Niemeyer, Department of Natural Resources, General Assembly and 2 more
PersonRick Niemeyer“Bill sponsor in the upper house”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Natural Resources“State department responsible for issuing certificates, conducting inspections, a”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body considering the bill”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Environmental Protection Agency“Federal agency handling UIC Class VI permit applications”Map →
PersonSpencer Deery“Bill sponsor in the upper house”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record