POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Minnesota establishes a 50 percent market value property tax exclusion for licensed in-home child care providers

Original title: Licensed in-home child care providers market value exclusion established.

Last action · May 9, 2025: Author added PerrymanSponsors: Danny Nadeau and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Minnesota House Bill 633 establishes a property tax equal to 50 percent of value for qualifying residential properties used to operate licensed family or group family day care programs. The commissioner of human services must provide annual provider lists to counties by July 1, 2025, and June 1 thereafter, with the tax change taking effect for property taxes payable in 2026.

Background
  • Minnesota property taxes are calculated using a property's taxable market value and classification rates defined under state statutes. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Licensed in-home child care providers

Directly affected

Counties

Counties must receive annual lists of licensed family day care providers from the commissioner of human services and adjust property tax statements accordingly.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who qualifies for the new in-home child care property tax exclusion?
Properties classified as 1a or the house, garage, and surrounding one acre of land of property classified as 2a that are used to operate a licensed family day care or group family day care program are eligible.
What is the exact amount of the market value exclusion?
The exclusion amount is 50 percent of the property's market value, rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
When does this tax exclusion begin?
The exclusion is effective beginning with property taxes payable in 2026.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. May 9, 2025House
    Author added Perryman
  2. Mar 5, 2025House
    Author added Warwas
  3. Feb 24, 2025HouseCommittee
    Committee report, to adopt as amended and re-refer to Taxes
  4. Feb 20, 2025House
    Author added Zeleznikar
  5. Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduction and first reading, referred to Children and Families Finance and Policy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Scott, Minnesota, Washington and 7 more
locationScott“County for regional rail authorities”Map →
locationMinnesota“State where the legislation is enacted”Map →
locationWashington“County for regional rail authorities”Map →
OrganizationCommissioner of Revenue“Prescribes the form and contents of the property tax statement”Map →
locationCarver“County for regional rail authorities”Map →
OrganizationCommissioner of Human Services“Required to provide a list of licensed family day care and group family day care”Map →
locationRamsey“County for regional rail authorities and public library service”Map →
locationHennepin“County for regional rail authorities”Map →
locationAnoka“County for regional rail authorities”Map →
locationDakota“County for regional rail authorities”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.revisor.mn.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record