POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Wisconsin Senate Bill 671 Creates New Criminal Offense for Child Grooming

Original title: An Act to amend 48.345 (3) (a) 2., 48.345 (3) (b) 2., 48.685 (1) (c) 2., 48.685 (4m) (b) 2., 48.685 (4m) (b) 2m., 50.065 (1) (e) 2., 51.20 (13) (ct) 2m., 103.34 (1) (b) 2., 111.335 (1m) (b) 1., 111.335 (1m) (d) 1., 165.84 (7) (ab) 1., 165.93 (1) (b), 301.046 (4) (b) (intro.), 301.048 (2) (bm) 1. a., 301.048 (4m) (b) (intro.), 301.45 (1d) (b), 302.05 (3) (a) 1., 302.105 (2) (intro.), 302.11 (1g) (a) 2., 302.116 (1) (a), 303.068 (4m) (b) (intro.), 304.06 (1) (d) 1., 304.06 (1) (em), 304.06 (2m) (a), 304.063 (2) (intro.), 343.06 (1) (i), 343.30 (2d), 440.312 (2), 440.982 (2), 767.461 (4), 901.08 (1) (b), 938.34 (3) (a) 2., 938.34 (3) (b) 2., 938.34 (15m) (bm), 939.615 (1) (b) 1., 939.62 (2m) (a) 1m. a., 939.62 (2m) (a) 2m. b., 939.632 (1) (e) 1., 939.74 (2) (c), 941.29 (1g) (a), 941.291 (1) (b), 948.13 (1) (a), 948.21 (1) (a), 949.03 (2), 968.28, 969.001 (3) (a), 969.08 (10) (b), 971.17 (1m) (b) 2m., 972.11 (2) (b) (intro.), 973.01 (3g), 973.0135 (1) (b) 2., 973.048 (2m), 973.176 (3), 973.20 (4m) and 980.01 (6) (a); to create 343.12 (7) (c) 18m., 786.36 (1m) (c) 16m. and 948.072 of the statutes; Relating to: creating a crime of grooming a child for sexual activity and providing a penalty.

Last action · March 23, 2026: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1Sponsors: Jesse James and 34 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Wisconsin Senate Bill 671 establishes a new specific criminal offense for a child for sexual activity and amends numerous related state statutes to integrate the new crime. The measure applies to individuals engaging in grooming behaviors with minors.

Why it matters

Establishes a distinct felony-level criminal charge and associated penalties for child activities that previously required prosecution under broader or collateral statutes, altering legal liabilities and sentencing guidelines.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Minors

Minors receive expanded legal protections through the creation of a specific criminal prohibition against child grooming.

Directly affected

State prosecutors and law enforcement

Law enforcement and prosecutors gain a specific statutory charge to address preliminary grooming behaviors prior to direct sexual offenses.

Key Facts

  • Creates a new crime of grooming a child for sexual activity under Section 948.072 of the statutes.
  • Amends numerous sections of the Wisconsin statutes including chapters 48, 50, 51, 103, 111, 165, 301, 302, 303, 304, 343, 440, 767, 901, 938, 939, 941, 948, 949, 968, 969, 971, 972, 973, and 980.
  • Updates cross-references in employment discrimination, occupational licensing, background checks, and correctional supervision laws to account for the new grooming offense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Senate Bill 671 do?
It creates a new specific crime for a child for sexual activity and updates numerous related statutes across Wisconsin law.
Which statutes are affected by this bill?
The bill amends provisions in chapters 48, 50, 51, 103, 111, 165, 301, 302, 303, 304, 343, 440, 767, 901, 938, 939, 941, 948, 949, 968, 969, 971, 972, 973, and 980 of the Wisconsin statutes.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Failed in the Senate.

Procedural history

10 actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Senate
    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
  2. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    Available for scheduling
  3. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0
  4. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0
  5. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    Executive action taken
  6. Jan 28, 2026Senate
    Public hearing held
Show 4 earlier actions
  1. Jan 7, 2026Senate
    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator James
  2. Dec 3, 2025Senate
    Senator Marklein added as a coauthor
  3. Nov 20, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
  4. Nov 20, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced by Senators James, Wanggaard, Hutton, Nass and Quinn; cosponsored by Representatives Nedweski, Brill, Dittrich, Behnke, Callahan, DeSmidt, Donovan, Duchow, Franklin, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Hurd, B. Jacobson, Kaufert, Kitchens, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Novak, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Snyder, Steffen, Tusler and Wichgers

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 30 more sponsors
NedweskiSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
BrillSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
DittrichSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
BehnkeSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
CallahanSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
DeSmidtSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
DonovanSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
DuchowSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
FranklinSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
GreenSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
GundrumSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
GustafsonSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
HurdSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
B. JacobsonSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
KaufertSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
KitchensSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
KnodlSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
KreibichSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
MaxeySenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
MosesSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
MurphySenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
MursauSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
NovakSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
O'ConnorSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
PentermanSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
PiwowarczykSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
SnyderSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
SteffenSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
TuslerSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match
WichgersSenatePrimary sponsorNo profile match

Sources

Open source document

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record