POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofhealthcare →
HR2581FEDERALIN_COMMITTEE
High Impact

Nurse Staffing Standards for Hospital Patient Safety and Quality Care Act of 2019

May 9, 2019

healthcarenursinghospital-safetylabor-rightsmedicaremedicaid

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently IN_COMMITTEE. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

This bill would change hospital operations by legally mandating specific nurse-to-patient ratios, which could impact hospital staffing costs, patient care delivery, and the legal rights of nurses to refuse assignments, with compliance required within two to four years depending on the hospital's location.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Registered Nurses

Nurses are subject to new staffing ratio requirements and gain legal protections against retaliation for refusing unsafe assignments.

Hospitals

Hospitals must implement new staffing plans, maintain public records, and comply with federal nurse-to-patient ratios or face civil penalties.

Medicare beneficiaries

Patients may experience changes in hospital staffing levels and care delivery as a result of the new mandates.

What changed

Current stage: IN_COMMITTEE.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill requires hospitals to implement specific minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratios and creates new protections for nurses who refuse assignments they deem unsafe. It also mandates that hospitals maintain transparent staffing records and provides for federal enforcement through Medicare, Medicaid, and other government health programs.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply to all hospitals?
Yes, the bill defines 'hospital' to include private hospitals as well as those operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Defense, and the Indian Health Services Program.
Can a nurse be fired for refusing an assignment?
No, the bill prohibits hospitals from discharging, discriminating, or retaliating against a nurse who refuses an assignment in good faith because they are not prepared by training or experience to fulfill it without compromising patient safety.
How will hospitals pay for these new staffing requirements?
The bill requires the Secretary of HHS to adjust Medicare payments to hospitals to cover the net costs incurred by complying with the new staffing requirements.

Why It Matters

This bill would change hospital operations by legally mandating specific nurse-to-patient ratios, which could impact hospital staffing costs, patient care delivery, and the legal rights of nurses to refuse assignments, with compliance required within two to four years depending on the hospital's location.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federalization of Staffing Standards

The bill represents a significant shift by moving nurse staffing regulation from the state level to a federal mandate enforced through Medicare and Medicaid participation.

Department of Health and Human Services

Connected Entities

personClarke of New York, Anna“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personJayapal, Pramila“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
organizationPublic Health Service Act“The Act amends this act”Map →
personLofgren, Zoe“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
organizationHealth Services Research study“Study on California nurse staffing ratios”Map →
personNorton, Eleanor“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personDelauro, Rosa“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personSherman, Mark“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personDeFazio, David“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personSchakowsky, Alexandria“Lead sponsor of the bill”Map →
personGabbard, A.J.“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personWilson of Florida, Lois“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personRaskin, Raja“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personKhanna, Ami“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personVelazquez, Alexandria“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personCohen, Steve“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personLee of California, Barbara“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personBlumenauer, Kurt“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personNadler, H. Roy“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personKelly of Illinois, Robin“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personBonamici, Luria“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personSecretary“Secretary's determination of effective date”Map →
personDingell, Debbie“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personPocan, Mark“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personTakano, Mark“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personRush, Elijah“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
organizationAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality“Study on nurse staffing and quality”Map →
personMoore, Jennifer“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personBrownley of California, Michelle“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personMcCollum, Grace“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
personDanny K. Davis“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record