Part ofMilitary Readiness →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

FEDERALcongressional record

High Impact

Proposed Restriction on Oil and Gas Agreements Affecting Military Training Areas

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6049

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Senator Padilla has proposed an amendment to the 2027 defense authorization bill that would restrict the Department of Defense from entering into oil and gas agreements that limit military access to training ranges off the coasts of Florida and California. The restriction would remain in place unless the Secretary of Defense certifies that such agreements will not significantly harm military training, testing, or operations.

Why it matters

This amendment would require the Department of Defense to prioritize military training access over oil and gas development in specific coastal areas, potentially impacting energy exploration permits off the coasts of Florida and California for 2027.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Department of Defense

The agency is restricted from entering into certain oil and gas agreements unless specific certification requirements are met.

Directly affected

Oil and gas industry

Permitting processes for oil and gas activities on the Outer Continental Shelf off the coasts of Florida and California may be subject to additional military review and potential limitations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this amendment ban all oil and gas drilling off the coasts of Florida and California?

No. It restricts the Department of Defense from entering into agreements that would limit military access to training ranges unless the Secretary of Defense certifies that the activity will not significantly harm military operations.

What information must the Secretary of Defense provide to bypass this restriction?

The Secretary must provide a detailed certification including a 10-year history of military use in the area, an assessment of alternative training sites, and an evaluation of how the proposed energy activities affect military missions.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Follow the record

Votes, people, money & the original source

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Related Legislation

congressional record

Senate Scheduling Update for S. 4784

The Senate has agreed to delay the vote on a cloture motion for S. 4784 until after the confirmation vote for the Schwartz nomination. This procedural

Connected Entities

Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse, Florida, California and 3 more

OrganizationMilitary Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse“Entity consulted regarding the impact of energy activities on military missions.”Map →

locationFlorida“Coastal state affected by the proposed range access limitations.”Map →

locationCalifornia“Coastal state affected by the proposed range access limitations.”Map →

OrganizationDepartment of Defense“The agency subject to the proposed funding and agreement limitations.”Map →

PersonPadilla, Mr.“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →

OrganizationDepartment of Energy“Department involved in defense-related activities.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance75
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy60
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment10
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz20
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools