POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

North Carolina Sets Minimum Insurance Payouts for Out-of-Network Ambulances and Caps Patient Copays

Original title: Insurance Coverage Emergency Ambulance Trans.

Last action · May 7, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate (Senate action)Sponsors: Donnie Loftis and 16 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

North Carolina requires health insurers to pay out-of-network emergency ambulance providers at least local government-approved rates or 400% of the Medicare rate, while capping patient cost-sharing at $100 or 10% of the reimbursement rate starting October 1, 2025.

Why it matters

Insured residents using out-of-network ambulances are shielded from unlimited balance billing while insurers face mandatory minimum payout floors.

Background
  • Emergency medical transportation out-of-network billing has historically been a significant source of surprise medical bills for insured consumers. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Out-of-network ambulance service providers

Receive guaranteed minimum reimbursement rates from insurers and direct payments for emergency transportation services.

Directly affected

Covered persons enrolled in health benefit plans

Have their out-of-network emergency ambulance cost-sharing capped at the lesser of $100 or 10% of the reimbursement rate and are protected from receiving insurer reimbursement checks.

Directly affected

Health insurers

Must pay out-of-network ambulance providers at prescribed statutory minimum rates and remit payments directly to providers.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the maximum amount an insurer can charge a patient for out-of-network emergency ambulance transportation?
Insurers cannot impose cost-sharing requirements that exceed the lesser of $100.00 or 10% of the established minimum allowable reimbursement rate.
Who receives the payment from the insurer for out-of-network emergency ambulance services?
The insurer must promptly remit payment directly to the ambulance services provider and is prohibited from sending reimbursement payments to the covered person.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

17 actions
  1. May 7, 2025Senate
    Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
  2. May 7, 2025Senate
    Passed 1st Reading
  3. May 7, 2025Senate
    Regular Message Received From House
  4. May 7, 2025House
    Regular Message Sent To Senate
  5. May 6, 2025House
    Passed 3rd Reading
  6. May 6, 2025House
    Passed 2nd Reading
Show 11 earlier actions
  1. May 5, 2025House
    Placed On Cal For 05/06/2025
  2. May 5, 2025House
    Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
  3. May 5, 2025House
    Reptd Fav
  4. Apr 30, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  5. Apr 30, 2025House
    Reptd Fav
  6. Apr 29, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Insurance
  7. Apr 29, 2025House
    Reptd Fav Com Substitute
  8. Apr 17, 2025House
    Serial Referral To Finance Stricken
  9. Mar 25, 2025House
    Ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Insurance, if favorable, Finance, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  10. Mar 25, 2025House
    Passed 1st Reading
  11. Mar 24, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Mandatory Direct-to-Provider Reimbursement

Insurers are explicitly barred from sending reimbursement payments for emergency transportation to covered persons, requiring direct payment to out-of-network providers.

Connected Entities

Donny Lambeth, Larry Potts, Employee Retirement Income Security Act and 3 more
PersonDonny Lambeth“Sponsor of House Bill 489”Map →
PersonLarry Potts“Sponsor of House Bill 489”Map →
OrganizationEmployee Retirement Income Security Act“Federal law regulating self-funded group plans that may opt into the provisions”Map →
PersonCody Huneycutt“Sponsor of House Bill 489”Map →
OrganizationCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services“Federal agency providing Medicare rates and interpretative guidelines”Map →
PersonDonnie Loftis“Primary sponsor of House Bill 489”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record