POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Ohio updates telemarketing laws and empowers Attorney General to penalize violations

Original title: Make changes to the telemarketing law

Last action · November 12, 2025: Referred to JudiciarySponsors: Theresa Gavarone and 16 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio SB 224 amends state telemarketing laws to prohibit violations of federal telemarketing rules and prohibits providing substantial assistance to violators, while granting the Attorney General expanded authority to investigate, subpoena, and seek civil penalties up to $1,500 per willful violation.

Why it matters

Telemarketers and s face new state-level civil penalties up to $1,500 per willful violation, while Ohio residents gain enhanced enforcement protections against deceptive calling and text messaging practices.

Background
  • State telemarketing laws in Ohio are structured around federal statutes including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991. context
  • The Ohio Attorney General enforces consumer protection laws and investigates deceptive trade practices across the state. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Telemarketers and Sellers

Telemarketers and sellers are prohibited from violating federal telemarketing rules and face increased state civil penalties of up to $1,500 per willful violation.

Directly affected

Voice Service Providers

Voice service providers are subject to liability provisions for substantial assistance unless they meet specific statutory exemptions as certified carriers.

Directly affected

Ohio Residents

Ohio residents receive enhanced protections against illegal telemarketing calls and text messages through expanded enforcement powers granted to the Attorney General.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What penalties can be imposed for violating Ohio's updated telemarketing laws?
Courts may impose a civil penalty of $500 for each violation, which increases to $1,500 per violation if the defendant willfully or knowingly committed the infraction.
Are voice service providers automatically liable if a third party uses their network to make illegal calls?
No. s are generally exempt from 'substantial assistance' liability if they meet specific statutory criteria, such as not being designated as non-cooperative by the FCC or operating as a certified local exchange carrier.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Nov 12, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Judiciary
  2. Nov 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Nov 5, 2025SenateFloor
    Passed
  4. Oct 29, 2025SenateCommittee
    Reported (Judiciary)
  5. Jun 25, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Judiciary
  6. Jun 18, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history & redline

3 versions on file
Comparing As Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee → As Passed by the Senate
removed addedOfficial text
removed: sb224_01_RS added: sb224_02_PS As removed: Reported added: Passed by the Senate removed: Judiciary Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No. 224 2025-2026 Senator Gavarone removed: Cosponsor: Senator Manning added: Cosponsors: Senators Manning, Blackshear, Cirino, Craig, DeMora, Hicks-Hudson, Ingram, Johnson, O'Brien, Patton, Reineke, Reynolds, Roegner, Romanchuk, Timken, Weinstein To amend section 109.87 of the Revised Code to make changes to the telemarketing law. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE […]
Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Voting Record

Show 1 earlier roll call

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Alignment with Federal Telemarketing Standards

The bill tightly integrates state enforcement mechanisms with federal telemarketing and consumer protection acts while establishing specific carve-outs for compliant voice service providers.

Connected Entities

Hearcel Craig, Public Utilities Commission, Nathan H. Manning and 12 more
PersonHearcel Craig“Senator, District 15, Cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationPublic Utilities Commission“State commission certifying telephone and wireless providers”Map →
PersonNathan H. Manning“Senator, District 13, Cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationFederal Trade Commission“Federal regulatory agency”Map →
OrganizationFederal Communications Commission“Federal regulatory agency for communications”Map →
OrganizationTelemarketing Fraud Enforcement Fund“Fund receiving collected civil penalties”Map →
PersonSandra O'Brien“Senator, District 32, Cosponsor”Map →
PersonWillis Blackshear“Senator, District 6, Cosponsor”Map →
PersonCatherine Ingram“Senator, District 9, Cosponsor”Map →
PersonTheresa Gavarone“Senator, District 2”Map →
PersonWilliam P. DeMora“Senator, District 25, Cosponsor”Map →
PersonThomas Patton“Senator, District 24, Cosponsor”Map →
PersonPaula Hicks-Hudson“Senator, District 11, Cosponsor”Map →
PersonTerry Johnson“Senator, District 14, Cosponsor”Map →
PersonJerry Cirino“Senator, District 18, Cosponsor”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record