POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Mississippi bill requires state to assign dyslexia supervisors to every county and deploy literacy data coaches

Original title: Qualified licensed dyslexia therapy teacher; require the State Department of Education to employ and assign one to each county.

Last action · February 3, 2026: 02/03 (H) Died In CommitteeSponsors: Troy Smith and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

The State Department of Education would be required to assign a qualified licensed dyslexia therapy teacher supervisor to every county and conduct a dyslexia data coach program in participating districts, effective July 1, 2026, subject to legislative funding.

Why it matters

Establishes a statewide county-by-county supervisory structure and data coaching program for student dyslexia intervention, directly affecting public school staffing, department payroll, and reading instruction methods.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

students diagnosed with dyslexia

Their educational progress and reading interventions are targeted by the required county supervisors and data coach programs.

Directly affected

State Department of Education

The department must employ, assign, and house county supervisors, establish selection criteria, and optionally contract out data coach programs.

Directly affected

public school districts

Willing districts may participate in the dyslexia data coach program and interact with assigned county supervisors.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where must the assigned dyslexia supervisors and data coaches live?
They must reside in the county wherein they have been assigned to serve.
Is the dyslexia data coach program mandatory for all school districts?
No, the program is conducted with willing school districts and/or schools and is subject to legislative appropriation.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 3, 2026House
    02/03 (H) Died In Committee
  2. Jan 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    01/16 (H) Referred To Education

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory County-Level Dyslexia Supervision

Shifts educational support by legally requiring a specialized dyslexia therapy teacher supervisor to be assigned and resident in every single county.

Connected Entities

Troy Smith, International Dyslexia Association, Andy Boyd and 2 more
PersonTroy Smith“Primary bill sponsor”Map →
OrganizationInternational Dyslexia Association“Standards provider for teacher training”Map →
PersonAndy Boyd“Bill co-sponsor from the 37th district”Map →
PersonBilly Adam Calvert“Bill co-sponsor”Map →
OrganizationState Department of Education“Mandated to assign supervisors and conduct the dyslexia programs”Map →

Sources

Open source document

billstatus.ls.state.ms.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record