POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Protecting Community Television Act (H.R. 3805)

Original title: Protecting Community Television Act

Last action · June 6, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.Sponsors: Troy Carter and 7 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill proposes a technical change to the to narrow the legal definition of a '' paid by cable operators to local governments. By changing the language from 'includes' to 'means,' the bill aims to restrict what types of payments can be classified as franchise fees.

Why it matters

This bill changes the legal definition of s, which could impact the amount of revenue local governments collect from cable companies and potentially affect the funding available for public, educational, and governmental (PEG) television channels.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Local Governments

Local governments may see changes in the types of fees they are legally permitted to collect from cable operators.

Directly affected

Cable Operators

Cable operators may see changes in their financial obligations and the classification of payments made to local franchising authorities.

Directly affected

Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) Channel Operators

These entities may be affected if the change in franchise fee definitions alters the funding streams provided by local cable franchises.

Key Facts

  • The bill is titled the 'Protecting Community Television Act'.
  • It amends Section 622(g)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 542(g)(1)).
  • The amendment changes the definition of 'franchise fee' from 'includes' to 'means'.
  • The amendment inserts the phrase 'other monetary' before the word 'assessment' in the definition.
Show all 6 facts
  • The bill was introduced by Mr. Carter of Louisiana on June 6, 2025.
  • The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a franchise fee in this context?
A is a payment made by a cable operator to a local government in exchange for the right to operate a cable system within that jurisdiction.
How does this bill change the law?
It narrows the definition of what constitutes a by changing the language from an inclusive list ('includes') to a restrictive definition ('means') and adding the term 'other monetary assessment'.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jun 6, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  2. Jun 6, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Narrowing Regulatory Definitions

The shift from 'includes' to 'means' is a common legislative tactic to restrict the scope of a definition, suggesting an intent to limit the types of payments classified as franchise fees.

Connected Entities

Carter of Louisiana, House Energy and Commerce Committee, Communications Act of 1934
PersonCarter of Louisiana“The U.S. Representative who introduced the bill.”Map →
OrganizationHouse Energy and Commerce Committee“The House committee to which the bill was referred.”Map →
otherCommunications Act of 1934“The existing federal law being amended by this bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record