New Rules for Labor Pools and Hiring
January 5, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Died in Messages. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
12 actions- Feb 24, 2026SenatePlaced on Calendar, on 2nd reading
- Feb 24, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 19 NAYS 0
- Feb 19, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 02/24/26, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
- Feb 12, 2026SenateNow in Fiscal Policy
- Feb 12, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development; YEAS 13 NAYS 0
- Feb 9, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development, 02/12/26, 2:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
Show 6 earlier actions
- Jan 28, 2026SenateNow in Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development
- Jan 28, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by Commerce and Tourism; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
- Jan 23, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Commerce and Tourism, 01/28/26, 10:30 am, 110 Senate Building
- Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced
- Jan 12, 2026SenateCommitteeReferred to Commerce and Tourism; Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development; Fiscal Policy
- Jan 5, 2026SenateIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This legislation changes the cost structure for businesses hiring temporary workers and creates a new annual registration requirement for agencies, while shifting the financial risk of litigation by mandating fee awards for prevailing parties.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Labor pools
They are subject to new annual registration requirements and are prohibited from charging placement fees to third-party users.
Third-party users
They are no longer subject to placement fees when directly hiring laborers referred by a labor pool.
Day laborers
Their right to accept permanent positions with third-party users is protected from restriction by labor pools.
Last recorded activity January 5, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a labor pool still charge a fee if I hire one of their workers?
What do labor pool companies need to do under this law?
Who pays for legal fees if there is a lawsuit?
Why It Matters
This legislation changes the cost structure for businesses hiring temporary workers and creates a new annual registration requirement for agencies, while shifting the financial risk of litigation by mandating fee awards for prevailing parties.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable
Total
21
Yes
20
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (21)
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · other
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Favorable
Total
16
Yes
15
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (16)
Tommy Wright
Republican · other
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Favorable
Total
11
Yes
10
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (11)
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · other
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Litigation Cost Shifting
The bill mandates attorney fee awards for the prevailing party, which is a significant shift in how legal costs are handled in labor pool disputes.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools