The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.North Carolina Bill Regulates Health Insurance Utilization Reviews and Sets Timelines for Prior Authorizations
Last action · April 6, 2026: Conferees Changed (House action)Sponsors: John Bell and 59 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
North Carolina health insurers and organizations are required to use licensed medical doctors of the same specialty for care denials, adhere to strict turnaround timelines of 24 to 48 hours for review decisions, and report annual utilization metrics starting October 1, 2025.
Patients and healthcare providers gain faster coverage determinations, mandatory specialist oversight for treatment denials, and streamlined appeal processes, while insurers face daily fines and disciplinary oversight from the North Carolina Medical Board for non-compliance.
- Utilization review processes govern how health insurance companies approve or deny medical treatments and procedures requested by doctors and patients. context
- The North Carolina State Health Plan provides health coverage for teachers, state employees, and their dependents. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Covered persons
Covered individuals experience defined response timelines for treatment requests, mandatory specialist review for denials, and guaranteed continuity of care during plan transitions.
Health insurers
Insurers must update utilization review programs, employ same-specialty physicians for denials, publish monthly statistics, and report annual data to the Commissioner under penalty of fines.
Healthcare providers
Providers receive direct consultation rights prior to denials, standardized timelines for decisions, and potential exemptions from prior authorization if approval rates exceed 80%.
North Carolina Medical Board
The Board acquires explicit subpoena authority over insurers and utilization review organizations to inspect records concerning physician involvement in review processes.
Key Facts
- Insurers must render determinations and notify providers within 48 hours for non-urgent healthcare services and within 24 hours for urgent services after obtaining necessary information.
- Noncertifications must be made by a licensed medical doctor who is in the same specialty as the provider and has experience treating the condition.
- Emergency services cannot be subjected to prior authorization or utilization review, and providers have a 24-hour notification window following emergency admission.
- Emergency post-evaluation or post-stabilization services must receive a utilization review determination within 60 minutes, or they are deemed approved.
Show all 11 facts
- Insurers failing to meet deadlines or other requirements are deemed to have automatically approved the requested healthcare services.
- Insurers must submit annual utilization review data reports to the Commissioner no later than March 1 of each year, with failure subject to a $5,000 per day fine.
- Performing utilization review tasks required of a physician is legally defined as the practice of medicine under G.S. 90-1.1(5).
- The North Carolina Medical Board is granted authority to subpoena insurers and utilization review organizations for records concerning physician involvement in reviews.
- Insurers cannot revoke a prior certification if care is provided within 45 business days, subject to specific exceptions such as eligibility lapse or material misrepresentation.
- Insurers must honor a prior utilization review determination granted by a previous insurer for at least 90 calendar days when a person changes health benefit plans.
- Providers who achieve an 80% or higher certification approval rate over a 12-month period qualify for an exemption from prior authorization requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if an insurer fails to respond to a utilization review request within the required deadline?
Who is qualified to issue a denial or noncertification for a medical service?
Are emergency services subject to prior authorization under this measure?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Failed in the House.
Procedural history
33 actions- Apr 6, 2026HouseConferees Changed
- Jun 24, 2025SenateConf Com Appointed
- Jun 24, 2025HouseConf Com Appointed
- Jun 17, 2025HouseFailed Concur In S Com Sub
- Jun 16, 2025HousePlaced On Cal For 06/17/2025
- Jun 16, 2025HouseWithdrawn From Com
Show 27 earlier actions
- Jun 9, 2025HouseRef To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- Jun 5, 2025HouseRegular Message Received For Concurrence in S Com Sub
- Jun 5, 2025SenateRegular Message Sent To House
- Jun 4, 2025SenatePassed 3rd Reading
- Jun 4, 2025SenatePassed 2nd Reading
- Jun 3, 2025SenateReptd Fav
- May 22, 2025SenateRe-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
- May 22, 2025SenateCom Substitute Adopted
- May 22, 2025SenateReptd Fav Com Substitute
- May 19, 2025SenateRe-ref to Health Care. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate
- May 19, 2025SenateWithdrawn From Com
- May 1, 2025SenateRef To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
- May 1, 2025SenatePassed 1st Reading
- May 1, 2025SenateRegular Message Received From House
- May 1, 2025HouseRegular Message Sent To Senate
- Apr 30, 2025HousePassed 3rd Reading
- Apr 30, 2025HousePassed 2nd Reading
- Apr 28, 2025HousePlaced On Cal For 04/30/2025
- Apr 28, 2025HouseCal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
- Apr 28, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Apr 16, 2025HouseRe-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- Apr 16, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Apr 15, 2025HouseRe-ref Com On Insurance
- Apr 15, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Mar 19, 2025HouseRef to the Com on Health, if favorable, Insurance, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- Mar 19, 2025HousePassed 1st Reading
- Mar 18, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
M11 Not Concur
Total
115
- Yes
- 110
- No
- 0
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 5
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (115)
91 more members
Show 2 earlier roll calls
Second Reading
Total
47
- Yes
- 39
- No
- 3
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 5
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (47)
23 more members
Second Reading
Total
115
- Yes
- 104
- No
- 1
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 10
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (115)
91 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 55 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Medical Board Subpoena Authority
The legislation expands the enforcement powers of the North Carolina Medical Board, giving it explicit authority to subpoena insurers and utilization review organizations regarding physician involvement.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.ncleg.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
