POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri bill creates civil lawsuits for failing to label AI-generated images, video, and audio

Original title: CIVIL ACTIONS FOR CERTAIN DAMAGES

Last action · April 9, 2026: HCS Reported Do Pass (H)Sponsor: Scott Miller

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Publishers and disseminators of -generated or modified images, videos, or audio are required to include a visible or audible disclosure mark developed by the secretary of state. Individuals who suffer injury from violations of this marking requirement are granted to bring a civil lawsuit for damages against the publisher or disseminator.

Why it matters

Creates a new legal liability and right to sue for individuals harmed by unlabeled media, shifting compliance responsibilities onto anyone publishing or disseminating such content.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Publishers of images, videos, or audio

Publishers and disseminators must include an official mark on all artificial intelligence-generated or modified media and face potential civil lawsuits for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Persons suffering injury from unlabeled artificial intelligence media

Individuals harmed by unlabeled artificial intelligence media gain the legal right to file a lawsuit for damages against publishers or disseminators.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is required to use the AI disclosure mark?
All persons or entities publishing or disseminating any image, video, or audio generated or modified using .
What happens if someone fails to label AI-generated media and a person is injured?
An injured person has to bring a for damages against the publisher or disseminator.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

8 actions
  1. Apr 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Reported Do Pass (H)
  2. Apr 8, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Voted Do Pass (H)
  3. Apr 8, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  4. Mar 30, 2026House
    Public Hearing Completed (H)
  5. Mar 23, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  6. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  2. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, General Assembly, Scott Miller
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“103rd General Assembly passing the legislation”Map →
PersonScott Miller“Representative who introduced House Bill No. 1747”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record