POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas Bill HB 1387 Expands Bar Exam Eligibility Pathways to Include Paralegal Experience and Legal Apprenticeships

Original title: Relating to a person's eligibility to sit for the examination for a license to practice law in this state.

Last action · May 8, 2025: Left pending in committeeSponsors: Wes Virdell and 15 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Relating to a person's eligibility to sit for the examination for a license to practice law in this state.

Why it matters

Aspiring attorneys in Texas gain alternative non-law school pathways to qualify for the bar examination, altering entry requirements for the legal profession.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Bar examination candidates

Candidates gain alternative non-law school pathways involving apprenticeships or paralegal work to qualify for the bar examination.

Directly affected

Licensed attorneys

Attorneys are newly authorized to provide supervised two-year legal apprenticeships that qualify candidates for the bar exam.

Directly affected

Paralegals

Paralegals with at least two years of full-time professional employment in Texas become eligible to sit for the bar exam.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What alternative pathways qualify a person to sit for the Texas bar exam under this bill?
In addition to completing an course of study, a person can qualify by completing a two-year apprenticeship supervised by a licensed Texas attorney or at least two years of full-time professional employment as a paralegal in Texas.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

10 actions
  1. May 8, 2025House
    Left pending in committee
  2. May 8, 2025House
    Considered in formal meeting
  3. Apr 23, 2025House
    Left pending in committee
  4. Apr 23, 2025House
    Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  5. Apr 23, 2025House
    Committee substitute considered in committee
  6. Apr 23, 2025House
    Considered in public hearing
Show 4 earlier actions
  1. Apr 23, 2025House
    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  2. Mar 11, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
  3. Mar 11, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  4. Nov 18, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Briscoe Cain, Wes Virdell, Government Code and 4 more
PersonBriscoe Cain“Bill sponsor”Map →
PersonWes Virdell“Primary bill sponsor in the lower house”Map →
OrganizationGovernment Code“State code amended by the bill”Map →
PersonBrent Money“Bill sponsor”Map →
PersonCody Vasut“Bill sponsor”Map →
OrganizationBoard of Law Examiners“Notifies candidates regarding character and fitness decisions”Map →
OrganizationTexas Supreme Court“Authorized to adopt rules on examination eligibility”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record