Proposed Changes to Healthcare Claim Dispute Resolution
January 9, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently dead. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
18 actions- Feb 26, 2026HouseAdded to Second Reading Calendar
- Feb 26, 2026HouseBill released to House Calendar
- Feb 26, 2026HouseReported out of Health & Human Services Committee
- Feb 26, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by Health & Human Services Committee
- Feb 24, 2026HouseAdded to Health & Human Services Committee agenda
- Feb 9, 2026HouseNow in Health & Human Services Committee
Show 12 earlier actions
- Feb 9, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Health & Human Services Committee
- Feb 9, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
- Feb 6, 2026HouseIntroducedCS Filed
- Feb 6, 2026HouseLaid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
- Feb 6, 2026HouseReported out of Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee
- Feb 5, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable with CS by Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee
- Feb 3, 2026HouseAdded to Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee agenda
- Jan 15, 2026HouseNow in Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Health & Human Services Committee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Jan 9, 2026HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
If enacted, this change would have streamlined the dispute process for healthcare providers and insurers by preventing duplicate reviews for specific out-of-network hospital claims, potentially reducing administrative costs for those involved in federal-level disputes.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Healthcare providers
The bill would have changed the eligibility of their payment disputes for state-level review.
Health insurance plans
The bill would have changed the eligibility of their payment disputes for state-level review.
Last recorded activity January 9, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Statewide provider and health plan claim dispute resolution program?
Did this bill become law?
Why It Matters
If enacted, this change would have streamlined the dispute process for healthcare providers and insurers by preventing duplicate reviews for specific out-of-network hospital claims, potentially reducing administrative costs for those involved in federal-level disputes.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable (Health & Human Services Committee)
Total
35
Yes
33
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
2
Abstain
0
How they voted (35)
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · absent
Demi Busatta
Republican · yes
Brian Hodgers
Republican · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · yes
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Mike Redondo
Republican · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Jennifer Kincart Jonsson
Republican · yes
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · absent
Allison Tant
Democratic · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Lauren Melo
Republican · yes
+ 11 more
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee)
Total
31
Yes
25
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
6
Abstain
0
How they voted (31)
RaShon Young
Democratic · yes
Kiyan Michael
Republican · yes
Brian Hodgers
Republican · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Anne Gerwig
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · absent
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · yes
JOHN SNYDER
- · absent
Webster Barnaby
Republican · yes
Dotie Joseph
Democratic · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
RaShon Young
Democratic · yes
David Borrero
Republican · yes
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · yes
JOHN SNYDER
- · absent
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · absent
Kiyan Michael
Republican · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
Dotie Joseph
Democratic · yes
Brian Hodgers
Republican · yes
+ 7 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Alignment with Federal Process
The bill attempted to reduce regulatory overlap by deferring to federal dispute resolution processes for specific out-of-network hospital claims.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools