The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas House Bill 89 restricts political subdivisions from holding repeat general obligation bond elections within two years
Last action · August 15, 2025: FiledSponsors: Ben Bumgarner and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
s are prohibited from putting an identical or substantially similar general obligation bond before voters if a similar proposition was rejected by voters within the preceding two years.
Local governments face a mandatory two-year waiting period before attempting to pass a bond measure that local voters previously turned down, altering local debt financing timelines and strategies.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
political subdivision
Political subdivisions are barred from submitting identical or substantially similar general obligation bond propositions to voters within two years of a previous rejection.
voters
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a local government hold another bond election if voters just rejected a similar proposal?
When does this limitation become effective for scheduled elections?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Aug 15, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 55)
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
