POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho establishes Assertive Community Treatment programs under Medicaid for individuals with severe mental illness

Original title: ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT – Adds to existing law to provide legislative approval for and to establish provisions regarding assertive community treatment.

Last action · February 24, 2026: Reported Printed and Referred to Health & Welfare

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT – Adds to existing law to provide legislative approval for and to establish provisions regarding assertive community treatment.

Why it matters

The measure restructures delivery and Medicaid funding for intensive mental health care in the state, directly affecting adults with severe functional impairments who experience frequent hospitalizations, crisis interventions, or incarceration.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Individuals with serious and persistent mental illness

Eligible individuals receive intensive 24/7 multidisciplinary community-based treatment, support, and rehabilitative services.

Directly affected

Idaho Department of Health and Welfare

The department is tasked with submitting the state plan amendment, administering programs, promulgating rules, and overseeing fidelity standards.

Directly affected

Assertive community treatment provider teams

Provider teams must meet specific staffing compositions, participant ratios, fidelity score thresholds, and single-unit billing structures.

Key Facts

  • The Department of Health and Welfare must submit a state plan amendment for Assertive Community Treatment to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services no later than March 1, 2026.
  • ACT services must be available twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week, delivering integrated psychiatric, medical, and substance use support primarily in community-based settings.
  • Eligible participants must have a primary diagnosis of a serious and persistent mental illness with significant functional impairment and a history of frequent crisis service use, hospitalizations, or incarceration.
  • The participant-to-staff ratio for ACT teams is mandated to be ten to one, and shall not exceed twelve participants to one staff person.
Show all 8 facts
  • Provider teams must achieve an initial minimum fidelity score of 3.0 on an approved measurement tool and reach a minimum score of 4.0 within three years of initial certification.
  • Medicaid reimbursement for ACT services is structured as a single monthly service unit per enrolled participant, inclusive of all rehabilitative services, outreach, travel, and crisis response.
  • One ACT provider shall be selected per region to ensure service delivery through a single integrated interdisciplinary team.
  • A participant cannot be discharged solely for treatment non-compliance, but may be relocated or discharged under specific conditions such as moving out of the area, long-term hospitalization exceeding thirty days, or exhibiting violent conduct toward team members.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible for Assertive Community Treatment services?
Individuals are eligible if they meet the state's criteria, have a primary diagnosis of serious and persistent mental illness with significant functional impairment, and demonstrate a pattern of frequent crisis service use, repeated hospitalizations, or incarceration.
How are ACT services funded and reimbursed under Medicaid?
Services are reimbursed using a single monthly service unit per enrolled participant that covers all rehabilitative services, outreach, coordination, travel time, and crisis response furnished during the billing month.
Can a participant be discharged from the program for failing to follow their treatment plan?
No, a participant shall not be discharged solely for failure to comply with a treatment plan, except under specific criteria such as moving out of the service area, prolonged hospitalization exceeding 30 days, voluntary withdrawal, successful goal attainment, or exhibiting violent conduct threatening staff safety.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 24, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Health & Welfare
  2. Feb 23, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Single Regional Provider Model

The legislation mandates that Assertive Community Treatment services be delivered through a single integrated team per region, prohibiting fragmented delivery across multiple entities.

Connected Entities

Idaho, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Welfare
locationIdaho“State legislature passing the bill”Map →
OrganizationCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services“Federal agency receiving the state plan amendment”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Health and Welfare“Administers ACT services and submits state plan amendments”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record