POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill Requires State to Remove Trees Threatening Private Structures or Reimburse Property Owners

Original title: Tree removal at state expense

Last action · February 9, 2026: To House Energy and Public WorksSponsors: Bill Ridenour and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

State agencies must remove trees on state-owned or leased property or rights-of-way that threaten private structures within six months of receiving a certified written request from a property owner or lessee. If the state fails to act, property owners may cut down the trees themselves after giving seven days' notice and file a claim against the state for reimbursement up to $10,000.

Why it matters

Property owners with structures near state land gain a direct legal mechanism to force tree removal or recover out-of-pocket removal costs up to $10,000 through a shortened state claims procedure.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

private property owners

Property owners gain the right to request tree removal from adjacent state land, enter state property to remove trees if the state fails to act, and file claims for reimbursement up to $10,000.

Directly affected

state agencies

State agencies are required to evaluate and remove threatening trees within six months of notice, prepare claim stipulations, and incur removal or reimbursement expenses.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must a property owner do before the state is required to remove a threatening tree?
The property owner or lessee must send a certified mail notice to the state agency that owns or leases the property, providing contact information, a description of the trees, and the reasons why they threaten a structure on private property.
Can a property owner cut down the trees themselves if the state ignores the request?
Yes, if the state does not remove the trees within six months of receiving notice, the property owner may enter state property to cut them down, provided they give the state written notice at least seven days prior to entry.
What is the maximum amount a property owner can recover for tree removal costs under the shortened procedure?
The amount claimed under the shortened procedure cannot exceed $10,000.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Energy and Public Works
  2. Feb 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Feb 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Energy and Public Works
  4. Feb 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

West Virginia Legislature, House Energy and Public Works
OrganizationWest Virginia Legislature“Legislative body introducing and passing the bill”Map →
OrganizationHouse Energy and Public Works“House committee referred the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record