Lobbying Disclosure: Friedman Properties (Q4 2017)
October 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This document identifies the specific private interests seeking to influence city officials regarding land use, signage, and access in Chicago during the final quarter of 2017.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Friedman Properties
The firm is seeking specific government approvals for development projects and signage.
Chicago City Council
Council members are the targets of lobbying efforts regarding legislative and administrative decisions.
Last recorded activity October 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- Lobbyist Kathleen A. Duncan represented Friedman Properties during the period of October 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017.
- The lobbying efforts targeted the Chicago City Council and individual Aldermen.
- The scope of lobbying included both administrative and legislative actions.
- Specific objectives included securing approvals for a 'Planned Development'.
- Specific objectives included seeking permission for the use of the public right-of-way.
- Specific objectives included seeking approvals for signage.
Why It Matters
This document identifies the specific private interests seeking to influence city officials regarding land use, signage, and access in Chicago during the final quarter of 2017.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a 'Planned Development' in this context?
What does 'use of the public right-of-way' mean?
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
KATHLEEN A DUNCAN
on behalf of FRIEDMAN PROPERTIES
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Multi-faceted Lobbying Strategy
The lobbyist explicitly targeted both administrative and legislative channels, suggesting a strategy that combines permit-level approvals with broader zoning or ordinance changes.
Connected Entities
Sources
data.cityofchicago.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools