Lobbying Disclosure: Scott E. Saef for Metra (Q1 2014)
January 1, 2014
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This document provides public transparency regarding the financial relationship between a public transit agency and its paid lobbyist for the period of January 1, 2014, through March 31, 2014.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Commuter Rail Division of the RTA (Metra)
The agency utilized and compensated a lobbyist to represent its interests in Chicago.
Scott E. Saef
The individual provided lobbying services and received compensation for the reported period.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2014.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- Scott E. Saef served as the lobbyist for the Commuter Rail Division of the RTA (Metra) during the first quarter of 2014.
- The reported compensation for these lobbying services was $3,160.
- The reporting period covered January 1, 2014, through March 31, 2014.
- The lobbying disclosure report was filed on January 21, 2015.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this document?
How much was the lobbyist paid for this period?
Why It Matters
This document provides public transparency regarding the financial relationship between a public transit agency and its paid lobbyist for the period of January 1, 2014, through March 31, 2014.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
SCOTT E SAEF
on behalf of COMMUTER RAIL DIVISON OF THE RTA (METRA)
SCOTT E SAEF
on behalf of COMMUTER RAIL DIVISON OF THE RTA (METRA)
SCOTT E SAEF
on behalf of COMMUTER RAIL DIVISON OF THE RTA (METRA)
SCOTT E SAEF
on behalf of COMMUTER RAIL DIVISON OF THE RTA (METRA)
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Delayed Filing
The report for Q1 2014 was filed on January 21, 2015, indicating a significant delay between the service period and the public disclosure.
Connected Entities
Sources
data.cityofchicago.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools