The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.House Resolution 1032: Rules for Upcoming Floor Votes
Last action · February 3, 2026: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Sponsor: Brian Jack
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This resolution sets the rules for how the House of Representatives will debate and vote on three specific items: a federal appropriations bill, a resolution to block a D.C. tax law, and a bill regarding domestic mining regulations.
This resolution dictates the timeline and debate structure for three major legislative items, including federal funding for the 2026 fiscal year, local D.C. tax policy, and national mining standards.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
District of Columbia residents
The resolution facilitates a vote on a federal resolution that could overturn a local D.C. tax law.
Mining industry
The resolution sets the stage for a vote on H.R. 4090, which would codify executive orders regarding hardrock mineral resources.
Federal agencies
The resolution moves forward the 2026 appropriations bill, which determines federal agency funding levels.
Key Facts
- H. Res. 1032 establishes the procedural rules for floor consideration of three separate legislative items.
- H.R. 7148 (2026 Appropriations) will be considered via a single motion to concur with Senate amendments, with one hour of debate.
- H.J. Res. 142 (D.C. Tax Disapproval) will be considered with one hour of debate and allows for one motion to recommit.
- H.R. 4090 (Mining Codification) will be considered with the Committee on Natural Resources' substitute amendment already adopted, with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit.
Show all 6 facts
- All points of order against the consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090 are waived.
- The previous question is ordered on all three items, limiting the ability to offer further amendments or motions once debate concludes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this resolution actually do?
Will there be more amendments allowed on these bills?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: signed.
Procedural history
11 actions- Feb 3, 2026HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Feb 3, 2026HouseOn agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 215 (Roll no. 52). (text: CR H1951-1952)
- Feb 3, 2026HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 215 (Roll no. 52). (text: CR H1951-1952)
- Feb 3, 2026HouseOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 210 (Roll no. 51). (consideration: CR H1959-1960)
- Feb 3, 2026HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1959-1960)
- Feb 3, 2026HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1032, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Show 5 earlier actions
- Feb 3, 2026HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1032.
- Feb 3, 2026HouseConsidered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1951-1959)
- Feb 3, 2026HousePlaced on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 59.
- Feb 3, 2026HouseThe resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 7148. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 4090.
- Feb 3, 2026HouseThe House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-478, by Mr. Jack.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
428
- Yes
- 216
- No
- 212
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (428)
404 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
On Ordering the Previous Question
Total
432
- Yes
- 212
- No
- 210
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 10
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (1)
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Federal Preemption of D.C. Law
The resolution prioritizes a vote to overturn a specific D.C. tax act, indicating a continued federal focus on local D.C. governance.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
