The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Resolution to Withdraw U.S. Armed Forces from Lebanon
Last action · June 4, 2026: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Sponsors: Rashida Tlaib and 25 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
This resolution directs the President to remove all United States Armed Forces from Lebanon within seven days of the resolution's adoption. It is introduced under the authority of the .
If passed, this resolution would legally mandate the withdrawal of U.S. military personnel from Lebanon within one week, directly impacting U.S. military deployment status in the region.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
U.S. Armed Forces
Personnel currently stationed in Lebanon would be required to withdraw within seven days of the resolution's passage.
The President of the United States
The President is the individual directed to execute the withdrawal of forces.
Key Facts
- The resolution mandates the removal of all U.S. Armed Forces from Lebanon.
- The deadline for withdrawal is 7 days after the date of the resolution's adoption.
- The resolution is introduced under Section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)).
- The resolution requires approval by both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Show all 5 facts
- The resolution was introduced in the House on April 13, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this resolution do?
How long does the President have to comply?
What is the legal basis for this resolution?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Failed in the House.
Procedural history
14 actions- Jun 4, 2026HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Jun 4, 2026HouseOn agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 92 - 324, 2 Present (Roll no. 201).
- Jun 4, 2026HouseFloorFailed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 92 - 324, 2 Present (Roll no. 201).
- Jun 4, 2026HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3872)
- Jun 3, 2026HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Con. Res. 84, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the concurrent resolution and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Tlaib demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Jun 3, 2026HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
Show 8 earlier actions
- Jun 3, 2026HouseDEBATE - The House resumed debate on H. Con. Res. 84.
- Jun 3, 2026HouseWORDS TAKEN DOWN - During the course of debate, exception was taken to certain words used and a demand was made to have the words taken down. After review, the Chair ruled that the words were in violation of the spirit of debate. Without objection, the words were stricken from the record.
- Jun 3, 2026HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 84.
- Jun 3, 2026HouseConsidered pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H3814-3822; text: CR H3814)
- Jun 3, 2026HouseConsideration initiated pursuant to a previous order.
- Jun 3, 2026HouseORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Mast asked unanimous consent that, it be in order at any time to consider H. Con. Res. 84 in the House if called up by the chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs or his designee; that the concurrent resolution be considered as read; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to adoption without intervening motion except for one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by Representative Mast of Florida and Representative Tlaib of Michigan, or their respective designees. Agreed to without objection.
- Apr 13, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Apr 13, 2026HouseSubmitted in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
409
- Yes
- 89
- No
- 320
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (409)
385 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Total
430
- Yes
- 92
- No
- 324
- Present
- 2
- Not voting
- 12
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (2)
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 21 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Invocation of War Powers
The use of Section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution is a rare and significant legislative action intended to compel executive military policy.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
