POLISCOPE
Amendment 4 · Florida statewide

Voter Approval of Constitutional Amendments

November 3, 2020Failed60% needed to pass

Sponsor: Florida Citizen Voters

Reported result
Yes 48.0%No 52.0%4.1-point margin

The marker is the 60% share this measure needed to pass.

In plain English

This measure would require that any proposed amendments or revisions to the Florida Constitution be approved by voters in two consecutive elections rather than one, with the same 60% passage threshold applied to each election, before taking effect.

Arguments for and against

Attributed claims extracted from the public record. Neither side is endorsed here.

Supporters

Proponents argue that requiring two elections would provide additional deliberation time and ensure broader consensus for constitutional changes, contending that the current single-election process allows major constitutional amendments to pass with limited public consideration.

Opponents

Opponents argue that the two-election requirement would create unnecessary delays in constitutional reform, increase election administration costs, and make it substantially harder to amend the constitution since approval would need to be secured twice rather than once.

Voter considerations

Voters might consider that this measure would raise the practical difficulty threshold for constitutional amendments beyond the existing 60% supermajority requirement, as it would require sustaining support across two separate electoral cycles.

Who's behind this measure?

Public positions and campaign money—not a recommendation for how to vote.

Supporting groups and campaigns

Groups taking a position
Campaign money
  • Keep Our Constitution Clean PC
    Raised
    $9,010,146.76
    Spent
    $9,004,877.12
    Snapshot retrieved Nov 8, 2026 · USD
    Donors & reporting details · Keep Our Constitution Clean PC

    Totals as compiled by Ballotpedia for the most recent reports Ballotpedia processed (coverage end not stated); cash contributions $165,500.00, in-kind contributions $8,844,646.76, cash expenditures $160,230.36.

    Reported donors are included in receipts, not additional money. This is not a complete donor list. Contributions do not establish influence over an outcome.

Largest reported donor to this side
Secondary reporting

Reported across this side’s campaigns; not assigned to an individual committee. See source for the reporting window.

Opposing groups and campaigns

Groups taking a position
More groups (1)
Campaign money
  • Committee to Advance Constitutional Values
    Raised
    $1,918,102.04
    Spent
    $2,014,317.13
    Snapshot retrieved Nov 8, 2026 · USD
    Donors & reporting details · Committee to Advance Constitutional Values

    Totals as compiled by Ballotpedia for the most recent reports Ballotpedia processed (coverage end not stated); cash contributions $1,448,315.33, in-kind contributions $469,786.71, cash expenditures $1,544,530.42.

    Reported donors are included in receipts, not additional money. This is not a complete donor list. Contributions do not establish influence over an outcome.

Dated snapshots, not live totals. Missing amounts are not zero. Committees are shown separately.

About sources & coverage

Group positions come from the linked sources. Secondary reporting and first-party statements are distinct from official filings. Committee-wide totals may fund other measures; they are not allocations to this measure. Donor amounts are already part of receipts; neither donors nor overlapping snapshots are added together.

Groups as listed by Ballotpedia (secondary reporting), retrieved 2026-11-08: campaigns, parties, unions and organizations; elected officials and candidates omitted.

Figures compiled by Ballotpedia (secondary reporting); retrieved 2026-11-08. Donor lists are the top donors to all committees on that side; they are not allocated to individual committees.

Official ballot summary

Requires all proposed amendments or revisions to the state constitution to be approved by the voters in two elections, instead of one, in order to take effect. The proposal applies the current thresholds for passage to each of the two elections.

Source: Florida Department of State, Division of Elections.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record